Archive for March 8th, 2007
One theory for these results that I’ve been playing with is that the current 4 target configurations are already beyond most people’s capacity, resulting in offline updating across the board. If this were true, I should be able to identify the handful of high functioning subjects and differentiate them statistically.
Specifically, these subjects should show the flat latencies during control.rotation that would be indicative of online updating. In this case, I should see some indication of an effect for load (control/wm). Is it there? Nope.
Boy, oh, boy - I should have expected that the relatively clean results of the last study wouldn’t translate into this one.
So the previous pointing distributions were short on any statistics. What happens when the numbers are tallied and cranks are turned?





